Hi,
On Tuesday, April 14, 2020 at 9:44:23 PM UTC-5, T. Ment wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 18:35:19 -0700 (PDT), rug...@nospam.plz wrote:
>
> >> In DOS Internals, Chappell says he likes symdeb.exe.
>
> > Just for comparison, I think most others would rather use
> > OpenWatcom's WD (probably with JWasm):
>
> I speak for myself. Chappell speaks for himself.
>
> YOU speak for "most others"
>
> Loser.
Did I miss something? I know you have issues with, well, everybody
and everything, but ... this was a purely technical response with
obvious links to related alternatives. Is that offensive to you??
(The devil is a loser; however, I did nothing to you.)
You claim to be a Christian, but you don't act like it.
I'd rather not raise any ire with others by spamming the Bible
here over dozens of off-topic messages. However, you should
definitely re-read some parts:
Luke 18, Matthew 5, 1 Corinthians 1.
However, I recognize your M.O. You'll just snip the irrelevant
part of the message and quip rudely back in response. It's
not clever, it's not wise, and frankly, it's a waste of time.
You seem very confused.
Unlike you, I don't have the luxury of arguing unjustly.
I have to act responsibly, if at all possible. Therefore,
I have to pray for you (see Matthew above). It's not that
I foresee that others care about my example, but it's
neither useful nor justified to argue over such nonsense.