Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 695 5G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (SD695) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 660 called cores (64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of two cores with up to 2.2 GHz based on the ARM Cortex-A78 design. And a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.7 GHz based on much smaller ARM Cortex-A55 cores. Both clusters can also used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a lower mid range Adreno 619 GPU, a X51 5G radio (up to 2.5 Gbits download, no mmWave), a 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5, 8x8 sounding, Dual Band, 2x2), a Bluetooth 5.2 radio, satellite positioning (GPS, QZSS, GLONASS, SBAS, Beidou and Galileo) and a video engine (support for H.265, H.264, VP8 and VP9).

Compared to the previous SD690, the SD695 is now manufactured in 6nm (instead of 8nm) and offers a higher clocked performance cluster. However, the SD695 only supports Wi-Fi 5 instead of Wi-Fi 6 of the SD690.

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

The MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra is a upper mid-range ARM-based SoC (system-on-a-chip) that is manufactured using the modern 4 nm process. It was specially designed for use in Android smartphones and is in the upper class in terms of performance. It supports all current mobile communication standards, including 5G SA. 

The CPU works with a total of eight cores, which are divided into two clusters. In the first cluster, an ARM Cortex-A78 power core clocked at 3.1 GHz is joined by three further ARM Cortex-A78 power cores clocked at 3 GHz. In the second cluster, four ARM Cortex-A55 power cores operate at 2.0 GHz. LPDDR5 RAM can be used as RAM and UFS 3.1 is supported as internal memory. 

In terms of connectivity, dual 5G with a theoretical peak download speed of up to 4.7 GBit/s is available, as well as WiFi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3.

The Mediatek Dimensity 8200-Ultra is a variant of the otherwise identical Mediatek Dimensity 8200 that has been specially customised for Xiaomi and features improvements to the camera ISP. An Imagiq 785 image processor is responsible for processing the camera data. Video recordings are supported with up to 4K at 60 fps. The CPU part of the older Dimensity 8100 is very similar and offers the same CPU and GPU cores.

The integrated ARM Mali-G610 MC6 graphics unit can power displays with a resolution of up to 2,960 x 1,440 pixels (WQHD+) and a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz. With Full HD+, even up to 180 Hz is possible.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonMediatek
CodenameKryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)Cortex-A78 / A55
Clock1700 - 2200 MHz2000 - 3100 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
1 x 3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
3 x 3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Technology6 nm4 nm
FeaturesAdreno 619 GPU, X51 5G Modem, Hexagon 692 DSP, Spectra 355L ISP, FastConnect 6200 (Wi-Fi 5)ARM Mali-G610 MC6 GPU, Dual 5G modem, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, H.264/HEVC video decoding
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 619ARM Mali-G610 MP6
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.google.com
Series: Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8050 compare2 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 compare2 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 compare2 - 2.85 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 compare2 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra « 2 - 3.1 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 7030 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 920 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 7020 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 930 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek MT8188J compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 900 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
L3 Cache4 MB

Benchmarks

6043 Points (71%)
4369 Points (50%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 893     avg: 906     median: 905.5 (27%)     max: 919 Points
1252 Points (38%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 1993     avg: 2073     median: 2064 (8%)     max: 2189 Points
4034 Points (16%)
1018 Points (43%)
3833 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
998 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3889 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3057     avg: 3136     median: 3084 (31%)     max: 3249 Points
4858 Points (49%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6998     avg: 7607     median: 7355 (8%)     max: 8302 Points
16050 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3162 Points (43%)
4726 Points (64%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7773 Points (19%)
15265 Points (37%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
6758 Points (11%)
15888 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2415 Points (36%)
4789 Points (72%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1298.2     avg: 1769     median: 1913.1 (2%)     max: 2501.3 ms
1233 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 17849     avg: 24051     median: 22407 (20%)     max: 31647 Points
42222 Points (38%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 58     avg: 74.3     median: 66 (19%)     max: 111 Points
107 Points (31%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 75     avg: 101     median: 95 (20%)     max: 156 Points
123 Points (26%)
903102 Points (55%)
269706 Points (74%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
4737 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 30.49     avg: 37.6     median: 38.9 (29%)     max: 41.9 MB/s
54.9 MB/s (40%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 312     avg: 356.9     median: 321.4 (10%)     max: 420 MB/s
1352 MB/s (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 18.22     avg: 24.5     median: 27.8 (34%)     max: 29 MB/s
36.8 MB/s (45%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 339.36     avg: 402.1     median: 399 (11%)     max: 462 MB/s
1588 MB/s (44%)
33757 Points (53%)
13966 Points (65%)
872 Points (33%)
4.5 Watt (2%)
1 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra → 190% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 09. 01:00:31

#0 checking url part for id 14148 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15120 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:39:01 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.112s ... 0.113s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.113s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14148 +0.003s ... 0.116s

#7 got single benchmarks 14148 +0.079s ... 0.196s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 15120 +0.003s ... 0.198s

#9 got single benchmarks 15120 +0.011s ... 0.209s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.209s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.171s ... 0.38s

#12 return log +0.031s ... 0.411s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)